Ops, Cookies!Ao continuar sua visita nesse site, você aceita o uso de cookies para garantir a melhor navegação possível, fazer estatísticas e permitir o compartilhamento de conteúdo nas redes sociais
The sports universe is transforming. Clubs, federations, tournaments and major sporting events all question their singularity. But how is it reflected?
This singularity may be expressed in structuring values, as well as in a strong image which must combine brand history, vision and promise. In short, sports entities position themselves more and more as brands. But not like any normal brands. They are “self-communicating brands”. Branding no longer predates communication. Branding and communication are becoming one; one hybrid “thing” in which graphic and verbal expressions form an identity. Let’s take the example of the Fédération Française d’Athlétisme (French Athletics Federation). It recently changed its FFA acronym and turned it into a name deriving from spoken language ATHLE. This semantic contraction of the primary sport, namely athletics, aims at popularizing practices in a more “pop” environment which leaves the stadium to feature a street approach of the sport. The brand lets the practitioner express himself in a modular territory which adjusts to every discipline.
The impact of sports brands’ hybrid character is all the more strategic as they have become lifestyle, entertainment and media brands at the same time. This hybridization is consistent with their business model which is becoming more and more complex. Living on licenses or advertising revenues is no longer sufficient for the clubs and federations to create the necessary value for the pursuit of their ambitions.
The development of sports entities must be based on a strong idea. Supported by the brand, this idea allows them to create, activate and modify their sources of profit. For instance, the NCAA Basketball Championship in the US or ASPIRE in Qatar (the equivalent of the INSEP in France) have built a value proposition which goes far beyond the sporting universe with the development of new services. In fact, these entities all have a wide diversity of know-how, it’s only waiting for monetization.
– What about accelerated training of business leaders by sports coaches?
– What about extra sporting events organized in high-quality premises?
– What about food re-education assisted by experienced nutritionists? Etc.
There are plenty of ideas and opportunities. They just need to materialize in new business cases and to be rolled out.
Sports clubs (particularly soccer clubs) face huge financial issues, so openness and diversity are critical. The diversification of the business model must lead to more and more significant investments on tangible assets (more technological and more experiential stadiums), as well as on human assets (player brands co-living with the club brand).
There lies the second specificity of the brand in the sports universe. It has to be extremely flexible. This is the reason why it is so essential to establish a stretch territory (disconnected from the brand’s core business) and an extension territory (related to the brand) to examine how far the brand can go. The PSG (Paris Saint Germain soccer club) has progressively moved forward to bolder territories negotiating partnerships with Levi’s, Maison Labiche and even with the Rolling Stones. A few days ago, the club proved its strategic innovation capacities once again when it announced the launch of its cryptocurrency in partnership with the startup Chiliz.
Beyond this strategic dimension, the graphic embodiment of the brand is critical. Could things have turned out differently without the rebranding of PSG? Since sport brands operate in verbal and graphic environments which are overloaded and complex, the creative impact plays a predominant part. Whether it’s a tournament or a club, the brand identity will evolve among sponsors and will be consumed via numerous forms of media. The brand will live mainly through screens. Its graphic impact must not conflict with surrounding brands. Emerging while blending in with stadiums, shirts, posters and sponsors is a real challenge. There are so many stakeholders which revolve around sport brands that implementing a traditional graphic charter becomes a pipe dream. It must be rethought to become a new personalized guideline system. This move is complex but exciting. It relies on a cohesive compilation of brand history, brand values and design trends.
To sum up, in all cases, sports brands must be designed for sharing; almost primitive sharing with simple but powerful gestures and sounds. This is how we need to design all brand assets of sports brands since they convey and remind us of emotions that no other universe manages to communicate.
Mathieu Sakkas – Head of Strategy
Photo credit: Nike